⚠︎ Example only. David Fenwick is an invented person, and every document below — including provider names — is fabricated to show the structure and depth of a Bapuji record.

David Fenwick

EXAMPLE RECORD
45 years · Male · NZ European · Wellington · assembled from 15 sources, 1981–2026
15
organisations
840
pages assembled
82
events on the timeline
6
things worth raising
4
clinicians engaged

This is what David received: his whole health story, assembled from every organisation holding a piece of it, and read for what it predicts about his risks — not just what has already happened. Set against current international guidelines, it becomes six specific things worth a conversation, each traceable right down to the document it came from.

The picture in one paragraph

A generally healthy 45-year-old whose results have all looked reasonable one at a time. Seen together across twenty years, three patterns stand out that no single visit could show — and that predict where his risk is heading before any one result would say so: blood pressure drifting up, cholesterol mildly high since his thirties, and blood sugar creeping toward the pre-diabetes range. Alongside them, an old knee injury that was never fully resolved and a family history that had never reached his GP. None urgent. All better acted on now than later.

What it changed

Before, David had a folder of PDFs he couldn't interpret and a vague sense he was "fine". Afterwards he had six specific things to raise and the evidence behind each. Over four months he saw four different clinicians and got onto a clear plan. The What David did tab follows that through.

How to read this. Open any entry in What to raise or Timeline and you'll see two layers: the plain-language summary, and a facsimile of the actual source document it was drawn from, with the organisation that holds it and how many pages sit behind that one entry. That's what "840 pages" actually means — not a claim, a sum you can check yourself in the Sources tab.

Six places where David's story points somewhere — ordered by how much each would benefit from attention now, while there's still time for it to matter. Tap a source tag to see the original document.

Every event on record, in order, as one continuous story rather than scattered visits. Tap a cell in the grid to jump to a year. Tap a lane name to isolate one kind of care. Tap any event to open the document behind it.

The record on its own changes nothing. What mattered is what David did with it. Over four months, the six things worth raising led him to four different clinicians — each conversation started by evidence he could put on the desk.

The point of the pathway. Every one of these conversations was possible before — but David didn't know to ask, and no clinician had the whole picture to prompt it. The record didn't treat anything. It got the right questions to the right people.

Every organisation that held part of David's record, with how much each held. Fifteen holders, requested one by one, over about seven weeks — summing to the 840 pages above.

Total assembled: pages across organisations
A note on completeness. Some organisations hold more than they first send, and a few complete their forms from whatever they have on file rather than a full copy — an insurer, for instance. Part of the work is knowing what to ask for and going back when the first response is thin. An absence in a record is not proof something didn't happen.
This is what you'd get → Join the waitlist